Web Documents

Knowles 2012

Created By: James Mosley


  • [1]Fish and Game Warden Cadet:--$3267 - $4278/mo
  • [2]Fish and Game Warden
    • [3]Range A: $3581 -- $4698/mo
    • [4]Range B: $4271 -- $5642/mo.

Additional Compensation

In addition to salary, Fish and Game Wardens can receive additional pay differentials as listed below:

  • General Recruitment and Retention
    The additional salary of $175 per month is for all wardens and other law enforcement classifications employed by the Department of Fish and Game. This differential recognizes the difficulty in recruiting and keeping qualified wardens.
  • Geographic Recruitment and Retention
    Employees headquartered and residing in one of the following 17 designated high cost counties receive a monthly differential of $220, $300, or $350 depending on the employee’s classification:
    Alameda, Contra Costa, Los Angeles, Marin, Monterey, Napa, Orange, San Diego, San Francisco, San Luis Obispo, San Mateo, Santa Barbara, Santa Clara, Santa Cruz, Solano, Sonoma, Ventura
    • Fish and Game Warden, Range A - $220
    • Fish and Game Warden, Range B - $300
    • Warden Pilot, Department of Fish and Game - $350
    • Fish and Game Patrol Lieutenant (Specialist) - $350
    • Fish and Game Patrol Lieutenant, (Supervisor) - $350
    • Lieutenant, Fish & Game Patrol Boat - $350
    • Captain, Fish and Game Patrol Boat - $350
    • Fish and Game Patrol Captain - $350
    • Assistant Chief - $350
Category: research report | Comments: 0 | Rate:
0 Votes
You have rated this item.

Employment Development Department 2012

Created By: James Mosley

Most Fish and Game Wardens work for the State Department of Fish and Game.
The Department accepts applications from qualified job seekers on a
continuous basis, but qualifying tests are usually given only every two
years.  The U.S. Department of Fish and Wildlife Service employs a few
special agents.  Prospective Fish and Game Wardens must have at [1]least two
years of college - 60 semester or equivalent quarter units.  Eighteen of
those units must be in police or biological science. 

The State Department of Fish and Game gives a written test that covers the
principals of law enforcement, conservation, the habits, ecology, and
distribution of California fish and wildlife, and the ability to reason
logically.  Job competitors must also take a physical exam, which includes
vision and hearing screening, and pass a physical endurance test that
includes swimming for 100 yards.

Cadets take a fish and game law enforcement training program after they are
hired.  This program is given at various police academy locations and is
accredited by the Commission on Peace Officer Standards.  Special Agents
(Wildlife) need a bachelor's degree in biology or criminal justice to work
for the federal government.

Helpful school courses are biology and math; physical education, especially
physically active team sports, are also important.  A strong interest in law
enforcement activities is also important.  Outdoor hobbies such as hunting,
fishing, camping, and hiking, help students prepare for this career.
Category: research report | Comments: 0 | Rate:
0 Votes
You have rated this item.

Department of Education, 2011-2012

Created By: James Mosley
The cost of attending Butte College in
Compare Oroville, California Colleges on CollegeNews.com
Compare California Colleges on CollegeNews.com
California is [1]$1,084 for in-state students and $5,884 for out-of-state students.
Category: research report | Comments: 0 | Rate:
0 Votes
You have rated this item.

Knowles 2010

Created By: James Mosley

Butte College Partners with Department of Fish and Game to Train New Wardens

In 2008 DFG teamed with Butte College to provide peace officer training for prospective Fish and Game Wardens. This partnership secured an academy facility and POST-certified training program for Fish and Game Warden Cadets on the college’s Oroville campus. Non DFG-sponsored law enforcement students into resource academy training classes if there are unfilled spaces available.

[1]Butte College was chosen for its outstanding police training facility and program. Wardens go through the Basic law enforcement training required of all peace officers plus extended classes on natural resource management and fish and game laws. The 928-acre campus, the largest in California, is also a designated wildlife refuge.

[2]Fish and Game Wardens work on land and water, in urban and remote areas, and encounter wildlife poachers as well as marijuana growers, so their training must be rigorous to help prepare them for any law enforcement situation. The Warden Academy program delivers the highest standard of academic and physical training to Cadets.


Category: research report | Comments: 0 | Rate:
0 Votes
You have rated this item.

Roland Kays 2011

Created By: James Mosley
How do animals use their habitat? Where do they go and what do they do? These basic questions are[1]key not only to understanding a species’ ecology and evolution, but also for addressing many of the environmental challenges we currently face, including problems posed by invasive species, the spread of zoonotic diseases and declines in wildlife populations due to anthropogenic climate and land-use changes. Monitoring the movements and activities of wild animals can be difficult, especially when the species in question are small, cryptic or move over large areas. In this paper, we describe an[2]omated Radio-Telemetry System (ARTS) that we designed and built on Barro Colorado Island (BCI), Panama to overcome these challenges. We describe the hardware and software we used to implement the ARTS, and discuss the scientific successes we have had using the system, as well as the logistical challenges we faced in maintaining the system in real-world, rainforest conditions[3] ARTS uses automated radio-telemetry receivers mounted on 40-m towers topped with arrays of directional antennas to track the activity and location of radio-collared study animals, 24 h a day, 7 days a week. These receiving units are [4]conected by a wireless network to a server housed in the laboratory on BCI, making these data available in real time to researchers via a web-accessible database. As long as study animals are within the range of the towers, the ARTS system collects data more frequently than typical animal-borne global positioning system collars (∼12 locations/h) with lower accuracy (approximately 50 m) but at much reduced cost per tag (∼10X less expensive). The geographic range of ARTS, like all VHF telemetry, is affected by the size of the radio-tag as well as its position in the forest (e.g. [5] tags in the canopy transmit farther than those on the forest floor). We present a model of signal propagation based on landscape conditions, which quantifies these effects and identifies sources of interference, including weather events and human activity.[6] ARTS has been used to track 374 individual animals from 38 species, including 17 mammal species, 12 birds, 7 reptiles or amphibians, as well as two species of plant seeds. These data elucidate the spatio-temporal dynamics of animal activity and movement at the site and have produced numerous peer-reviewed publications, student theses, magazine articles, educational programs and film documentaries. These data are also relevant to long-term population monitoring and conservation plans. Both the successes and the failures of the ARTS system are applicable to broader sensor network applications and are valuable for advancing sensor network research.

Category: research report | Comments: 0 | Rate:
0 Votes
You have rated this item.

Martin Wikelski et. al. 2006

Created By: James Mosley
Going wild: what a global small-animal tracking system could do for experimental biologists
Martin Wikelski1,*, Roland W. Kays2, N. Jeremy Kasdin3, Kasper Thorup4, James A. Smith5 and George W. Swenson Jr6
+ Author Affiliations

1 Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA
2 Mammal Lab, New York State Museum, CEC 3140, Albany, NY 12230, USA
3 Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA
4 Copenhagen Bird Ringing Centre, Zoological Museum, University of Copenhagen, DK-2100 Denmark
5 Goddard Space Flight Center, NASA, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA
6 Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering and Department of Astronomy, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA
*↵ Author for correspondence (e-mail: wikelski@princeton.edu)
Accepted October 26, 2006.

Next Section

[1]Tracking animals over large temporal and spatial scales has revealed invaluable and spectacular biological information, particularly when the paths and fates of individuals can be monitored on a global scale. However, [2]only large animals (greater than ∼300 g) currently can be followed globally because of power and size constraints on the tracking devices. And yet the vast majority of animals is small. Tracking small animals is important because they are often part of evolutionary and ecological experiments, they provide important ecosystem services and they are of conservation concern or pose harm to human health. Here, we propose a small-animal satellite tracking system that would enable the global monitoring of animals down to the size of the smallest birds, mammals (bats), marine life and eventually large insects. To create the scientific framework necessary for such a global project, we formed the ICARUS initiative (www.IcarusInitiative.org), the International Cooperation for Animal Research Using Space. ICARUS also highlights how small-animal tracking could address some of the `Grand Challenges in Environmental Sciences' identified by the US National Academy of Sciences, such as the spread of infectious diseases or the relationship between biological diversity and ecosystem functioning. Small-animal tracking would allow the quantitative assessment of dispersal and migration in natural populations and thus help solve enigmas regarding population dynamics, extinctions and invasions. Experimental biologists may find a global small-animal tracking system helpful in testing, validating and expanding laboratory-derived discoveries in wild, natural populations. We suggest that the relatively modest investment into a global small-animal tracking system will pay off by providing unprecedented insights into both basic and applied nature.

[3]Tracking small animals over large spatial and temporal scales could prove to be one of the most powerful techniques of the early 21st century, offering potential solutions to a wide range of biological and societal questions that date back two millennia to the Greek philosopher Aristotle's enigma about songbird migration. Several of the more recent Grand Challenges in Environmental Sciences, such as the regulation and functional consequences of biological diversity or the surveillance of the population ecology of zoonotic hosts, pathogens or vectors, could also be addressed by a global small-animal tracking system.

Our discussion is intended to contribute to an emerging groundswell of scientific support to make such a new technological system happen.

small animal ICARUS initiative migration pattern migratory bird orientation satellite field experiments tracking technology telemetry songbird bat insect
Previous Section
Next Section
Applications of a global small animal tracking system

Songbird movements as an example
[4]Imagine tracking the individual movements of red-billed queleas (Quelea quelea) across the African continent (Ward, 1971; Dallimer and Jones, 2002). Queleas are the world's most abundant birds and have a breeding population in excess of 1.5 billion. [5]Single colonies can contain up to 30 million birds and these large individual colonies can destroy up to 5% of grain crops in the Sahel zone of Africa (Bruggers and Elliott, 1989). [6]Queleas can migrate long distances, sometimes more than 2000 km, to seek appropriate breeding areas or to avoid food shortage (Ward, 1971). Beyond the obvious applied benefit of planning for human health emergencies such as widespread famines in the present and projected paths of these `feathered locusts' (Manikowski, 1988; Malthus, 1995; Mullie et al., 1999), researchers could also test whether our mechanistic, lab-derived understanding of migratory drivers truly reflects migratory decisions of individuals that join the swarming herds in fields and deserts (Marshall and Disney, 1956; Desdisney et al., 1959; Wolfson and Winchester, 1959; Jones and Ward, 1976). Although it remains unclear whether a mechanistic knowledge of quelea movement would enable agricultural managers to prevent major devastations from the outset (Manikowski, 1988), tracking individuals might at least allow for a predictive forecast of pattern, similar to a tornado or hurricane warning system (Malthus, 1995).

Previous Section
Next Section
The power of combined laboratory and field experiments

In general, we suggest that a true understanding of natural phenomena, and the attendant applications that such an understanding enables, hinges upon our ability to translate and test mechanistic, laboratory-based findings in the real world (Table 1). Ideally, previous lab-based experiments conducted under controlled conditions would be repeated in the wild to validate lab-derived hypotheses and to generate new hypotheses about physiological, behavioral and life-history adaptations of animals that cannot be expressed in a laboratory setting (Bartholomew, 1986). Invaluable progress will be made in integrative and experimental biology once we are able to track the whereabouts of small animals across the globe (Lawton and May, 1983; National Academy of Sciences, 2001). For example, lab-based findings demonstrate that navigation in laboratory conditions is altered or impaired by hippocampal lesions (Sherry and Vaccarino, 1989; Strasser and Bingman, 1997) and that trigeminal nerve section prevents pigeons from sensing the magnetic field. However, studies on free-flying birds show that in both cases pigeons are nevertheless able to home (Gagliardo et al., 1999; Gagliardo et al., 2006). Furthermore, whatever the magnetic manipulation imposed on pigeons, only vanishing bearings are affected; the pigeons are always able to home (Wallraff, 1999). In the field of migratory bird orientation, Perdeck's classic field experiment testing songbird orientation mechanisms in nature (Perdeck, 1958) is still cited as providing unparalleled insight into changes in orientation mechanisms between young and adult birds. Furthermore, Muheim et al.'s review (Muheim et al., 2006) suggests that a field-based test of cue-conflicts during songbird orientation (Cochran et al., 2004) provided data that helped resolve long-standing disputes over results of lab-based orientation studies. Given this clear importance of tracking small migrating animals, it is remarkable that even after a century of songbird migration research, one 6-day track of a single Swainson's thrush (Catharus ustulatus) conducted 32 years ago (in 1973) by Bill Cochran (Cochran, 1987) remains our globally best data set describing the individual decisions of an estimated forty billion songbirds migrating annually among continents. All other data on individual songbird migration are limited to one or two nights of migratory flight (Cochran et al., 2004; Diehl and Larkin, 1998; Wikelski et al., 2003; Cochran and Wikelski, 2005; Bowlin et al., 2004) or banding studies connecting dots across continents (Thorup and Rahbek, 2004). We know even less about migration in small mammals such as bats (Tuttle and Stevenson, 1977; Cryan et al., 2004). Even so, this lack of knowledge of individual migration pattern should not conceal the fact that major progress in small-animal migration continues to be made, with spectacular insights being published in rapid succession (Alerstam and Hedenström, 1998; Berthold, 2001).

View this table:
In this window In a new window
Table 1.
Examples of studies using a system for tracking small animals from space that could greatly enhance existing knowledge

Previous Section
Next Section
A global challenge for experimental biologists: dispersal and long-distance migration

[7]Migrating animals pose the most extreme challenge in animal tracking (Cochran, 1972), but even repeatedly locating resident study animals is rarely easy (Winkler et al., 2004). [8]Many animal species are cryptic, shy and faster than the field biologists chasing after them. Nevertheless, there are many situations in nature where this is not true, and experimental biologists have taken advantage of this. The bonanza of knowledge that these situations have produced illustrates the scientific potential of a global tracking system. The Galapagos are one such example where animal dispersal is limited. The extraordinary success of Rosemary and Peter Grant's long-term investigation on Darwin's finches (Grant and Grant, 1996) relies on the ability to reliably relocate individuals, enabled because they work on birds living on a small, desolate crater island 1000 km off the Pacific coast of South America. In most other `open' study systems, the demonstration of microevolutionary processes would have been much more equivocal.

[9]The only reliable approach for animal tracking with guaranteed global coverage and constant access is via satellite. Present satellite technology allows us to track large (>300 g) animals globally and has led to spectacular insights. Weimerskirch et al. tracked wandering albatrosses (Diomedea exulans) around the South Pole and through the Indian Ocean and related their wanderings to feeding rates and food distribution (Weimerskirch et al., 1993). Fuller and colleagues found a breeding snowy owl in Alaska one year, then in Canada and in Siberia in subsequent years (Fuller et al., 2003), presumably also breeding at these locations. Block and coworkers tracked bluefin tuna across the entire Atlantic and into the Mediterranean Sea (Block et al., 2005). Although all of these studies are remarkable, many large animals such as petrels or albatrosses may outlive their researchers (Clapp and Sibley, 1966) and thus do not allow for evolutionary trends to be observed. Similarly, for many experimental studies, large animals are not ideally suited as they are either endangered and protected, not numerous enough, again too long-lived or simply too difficult to keep in any numbers to study selection on certain traits.

[10]The most limiting factor of modern satellite tracking methods is the size of the tag. The [11]smallest commercially available satellite transmitter in 2006 (9.5 g; www.microwavetelemetry.com) is still too large for ∼81% of all bird species [6106 bird species of 7514 species for which body weights are available weigh less than 240 g (Bennett and Owens, 2002); following the <5% body weight rule (Murray and Fuller, 2000)]. Similarly, ∼66.8% of the world's mammal fauna cannot be tracked over long distances, i.e. from space, again because of body weight constraints on transmitter size [Fig. 1; 3763 of 5630 species for which body weights are available (Smith et al., 2003)].

Previous Section
Next Section
Beyond Aristotle's migration enigma: tracking small animals globally

We suggest here that tracking small mobile animals will solve some of the longest-standing biological enigmas across a range of disciplines and provide a much sought-after tool for experimental biologists of all fields (e.g. Pennycuick, 1969; Hedenström and Alerstam, 1997; Klaassen et al., 2000). Aristotle wondered about 2000 years ago where songbirds disappeared to in winter (Peck, 1968). For many of the species that the famous natural philosopher was concerned about, we are still rather ignorant - even in Europe, where scientific bird banding started more than 100 years ago (Berthold, 2001). For most of the species wintering in tropical areas, our knowledge about wintering homes and migration routes is limited to less than a handful of recoveries in the presumed wintering areas and the information contained in the recordings of observers (Thorup and Rahbek, 2004).

View larger version:
In this page In a new window
Download as PowerPoint Slide
Fig. 1.
The body weight distribution of the world's mammals demonstrates that most mammals are small. [13]Approximately 66% of the world's mammals cannot be followed over large distances (i.e. be tracked from space) because mammals smaller than∼ 240 g cannot carry satellite transmitters (from Smith et al., 2003).

Other questions for biologists that such new satellite tracking methods could address are natal dispersal (Winkler et al., 2004), a mechanism critical to our understanding and modeling of animal demography (Lawton and May, 1983), metapopulation dynamics (Robinson et al., 1995), life-history evolution (Sillett and Holmes, 2002) and extinction (Jackson, 1979; Webster et al., 2002). For example, [14]it is unknown whether the fragmented landscapes of the North American Midwest are population sinks for wood thrushes or whether these long-distance migratory songbirds sustain healthy populations amidst the corn and soybean fields, despite high nest predation (Robinson et al., 1995). Long-term tracking over large spatial scales could be used to discover when and where free-ranging animals die, helping to improve our understanding of the ecology of the different life-cycle stages that are otherwise very difficult to investigate (Rubenstein et al., 2002). Furthermore, the paths of birds, bats, rodents and insects carrying diseases could be followed (Rappole et al., 2000; Malkinson et al., 2002).

What is needed to address these problems is a system that can track hundreds of small animals down to the size of a 6 g hummingbird or large insects (Naef-Daenzer et al., 2005; Wikelski et al., 2006) over large, continental distances and over long periods of time. Individuals should be tracked over at least one entire year to solve pressing scientific and conservation questions, such as where individuals die and what stopover sites are most important (Moore and Simons, 1992; McNamara et al., 1998; Moore, 2000; Sillett and Holmes, 2002).

Previous Section
Next Section
Why current technology is not sufficient

Various new technologies or combinations of already existing technologies could theoretically provide the means to fulfill these science requirements, although each has its own series of hurdles to overcome before meeting our scientific needs. For example, to understand the connectivity between breeding and wintering grounds, a combination of genetic, isotopic and banding studies could provide significant insights (Rubenstein et al., 2002). However, the spatial precision of these methods is inherently limited (Rubenstein and Hobson, 2004) and the actual routes that animals take during migration would remain unknown. Satellite tracking systems such as ARGOS (www.argosinc.com) have produced spectacular global location data for large animals, for example albatrosses (Weimerskirch et al., 1993). ARGOS instruments are housed on board different satellites from the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, The Japanese Space Agency and the European Meteorological Satellite organization. Two satellites are operational at any time in ∼850 km orbits. The ARGOS system collects data from Platform Terminal Transmitters (PTTs) and delivers telemetry data directly to the users. PTT satellite tags may be shrunk down to smaller sizes in the future but will be unlikely to surpass a lower size limit of 5-8 g. GPS (Global Positioning System) tags are now approaching 5-10 g (Lipp et al., 2004; www.technosmart.edu), but these tags often need to be recovered to read out the positions and they still remain too large for most animals. GPS tags with a communication network to transmit data are even heavier (30 g; www.microwavetelemetry.com). Miniaturizing cell-phone technology holds high promises but also high hurdles. The hardware and software (including >1 million lines of code) are advanced and inexpensive to purchase but very customized to commercial applications. It is unclear to what degree a small market such as experimental biology can capitalize on this technology. Furthermore, network coverage remains limited on a global scale and locational accuracy is low (Stokely, 2005). Radar technology, either passive or active, also holds many promises but, because of the immobility of most radar installations, will not resolve long-distance migration of individuals (passive radar) (Gauthreaux and Belser, 2003). Active radar, such as the cross-band transponder technology, faces similar power and detection problems as the ARGOS satellite tags (www.earthspan.org).

Previous Section
Next Section
A global solution to track small animals

All long-distance tracking problems boil down to constraints in the emitted signal power of animal-borne tags and the detection of these weak signals against background noise (Cochran and Wikelski, 2005). These problems are not unique to animal tracking. Another scientific discipline has already addressed similar, albeit inverse, problems. As radio astronomers cannot increase the power emitted by distant galaxies or control the nature of the radio emissions, they were forced to build sensitive receivers with sophisticated antennae and to develop elaborate signal processing algorithms (e.g. Kraus, 1986; Thompson et al., 1986). We suggest that the best technical solution for experimental biologists involves a similar solution (Cochran and Wikelski, 2005; Cochran and Wikelski, 2005). Radio astronomers point antennas into space to locate faint radio sources against background noise tens of thousands of times stronger. Wildlife biologists could point antennas towards earth from near-earth orbit to locate small radio transmitters attached to animals. Radio telemetry receivers and antennas mounted on satellites have global reach and are a natural extension of the ground and aerial radio techniques that have been the mainstay of animal tracking for the past 45 years (Lord et al., 1962). Extending this space technology to accommodate much smaller animals than can be served by the ARGOS program will have very great benefits to the study of dispersal and migration.

The physics of this scenario has been modeled and shown to provide a workable solution using presently available radio technology. Satellite-mounted radio receivers could track radio-tags with a radiated power as low as 1 mW with an accuracy of a few km under favorable conditions. This power can be achieved by modern tags as small as <1 g, which could be carried by, for example, migrating birds, bats, rodents, marine life or even desert insects. In the marine realm, radio transmitters could not be received in space when animals are below the surface, but a satellite system could work for surfacing animals or with the help of pop-up archival tags (Block et al., 2005). The remote measurement of physiological parameters characterizing the state of animals could be added to any of these tags (Cooke et al., 2004; Bowlin et al., 2005).

Previous Section
Next Section
ICARUS can make a small-animal tracking satellite fly

Given the potential for this empowering technology to transform our understanding of the natural world, we have formed a global initiative to support its deployment: the International Cooperation for Animal Research Using Space (ICARUS; www.icarusinitiative.org). We propose to employ radio technology on a near-earth orbit satellite (to be deployed) to track small animals around the globe. Within this framework, one possible actual satellite design is already being considered (www.icarusinitiative.org/solutions). The benefits of such a system seem obvious to scientists, but many hurdles remain to convince funding agencies and politicians that such an effort is worth the investment (50-100 million US$) required to build and launch a satellite. This paper represents a start at this task, highlighting a number of age-old questions about the natural world that such a system could solve and why they are broadly important in basic and applied ways. We encourage experimental biologists to consider how global tracking could help address their research needs and together create the scientific groundswell to make ICARUS fly.

Previous Section
Next Section

This study was partially supported by NSF RCN (MIGRATE), the National Geographic Society and the Peninsula Foundation (Frank Levinson). We also thank Princeton University, the Danish Natural Science Council and the Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute for support.

© The Company of Biologists Limited 2007
Previous Section


↵ Alerstam, T. and Hedenström, A. (1998). Optimal migration. J. Avian Biol. 29,339 -340.
↵ Bartholomew, G. A. (1986). The role of natural history in contemporary biology. Bioscience 3, 324-329. CrossRef
↵ Bennett, P. M. and Owens, I. P. F. (2002). Evolutionary Ecology of Birds: Life Histories, Mating Systems and Extinction. New York: Oxford University Press.
↵ Berthold, P. (2001). Bird Migration: A General Survey. New York: Oxford University Press.
↵ Block, B. A., Teo, S. L. H., Walli, A., Boustany, A., Stokesbury, M. J. W., Farwell, C. J., Weng, K. C., Dewar, H. and Williams, T. D. (2005). Electronic tagging and population structure of Atlantic bluefin tuna. Nature 434,1121 -1127. CrossRefMedline
↵ Bowlin, M. S., Cochran, W. W. and Wikelski, M. (2005). Biotelemetry of New World thrushes during migration: physiology, energetics and orientation in the wild. Integr. Comp. Biol. 45,295 -304. Abstract/FREE Full Text
↵ Bruggers, R. L. and Elliott, C. C. H. (1989). Quelea quelea, Africa's Bird Pest. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
↵ Clapp, R. B. and Sibley, F. C. (1966). Longevity records of some central Pacific seabirds. Bird Banding 38,193 -197.
↵ Cochran, W. W. (1972). Long-distance tracking of birds. In Animal Orientation and Navigation (ed. K. Schmidt-Koenig, G. J. Jacobs, S. R. Galler and R. E. Belleville), pp.39 -59. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
↵ Cochran, W. W. (1987). Orientation and other migratory behaviors of a Swainson's Thrush followed for 1500 km. Anim. Behav. 35,927 -929. CrossRefWeb of Science
↵ Cochran, W. W. and Wikelski, M. (2005). Individual migratory tactics of New World Catharus thrushes: current knowledge and future tracking options from space. In Birds of Two Worlds (ed. P. Marra and R. Greenberg), pp.274 -289. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
↵ Cochran, W. W., Mouritsen, H. and Wikelski, M. (2004). Migrating songbirds recalibrate their magnetic compass daily from twilight cues. Science 304,405 -408. Abstract/FREE Full Text
↵ Cooke, S. J., Hinch, S. G., Wikelski, M., Andrews, R. D., Kuchel, L. J., Wolcott, T. G. and Butler, P. J. (2004). Biotelemetry: a mechanistic approach to ecology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19,335 -343.
↵ Cryan, P. M., Bogan, M. A., Rye, R. O., Landis, G. P. and Kester, C. L. (2004). Stable hydrogen isotope analysis of bat hair as evidence for seasonal molt and long-distance migration. J. Mammal. 85,995 -1001. CrossRef
↵ Dallimer, M. and Jones, P. J. (2002). Migration orientation behaviour of the red-billed quelea Quelea quelea. J. Avian Biol. 33,89 -94.
↵ Desdisney, H. J., Lofts, B. and Marshall, A. J. (1959). Duration of the regeneration period of the internal reproductive rhythm in a Xerophilous equatorial bird, Quelea quelea.Nature 184,1659 -1660. CrossRef
↵ Diehl, R. H. and Larkin, R. P. (1998). Wing beat frequency of Catharus thrushes during nocturnal migration, measured via radio telemetry. Auk 115,591 -601. Web of Science
↵ Fuller, M. R., Holt, D. and Schueck, L. S. (2003). Snowy owl movements: variation on the migration theme. In Avian Migration (ed. P. Berthold, E. Gwinner and E. Sonnenschein), pp. 359-366. Heidelberg: Springer.
↵ Gagliardo, A., Ioalé, P. and Bingman, V. P. (1999). Homing in pigeons: the role of the hippocampal formation in the representation of landmarks used for navigation. J. Neurosci. 19,311 -315. Abstract/FREE Full Text
↵ Gagliardo, A., Ioalè, P., Savini, M. and Wild, J. M. (2006). Having the nerve to home: trigeminal magnetoreceptor versus olfactory mediation of homing in pigeons. J. Exp. Biol. 209,2888 -2892. Abstract/FREE Full Text
↵ Gauthreaux, S. A. and Belser, C. G. (2003). Radar ornithology and biological conservation. Auk 120,266 -277. CrossRefWeb of Science
↵ Grant, P. R. and Grant, B. R. (1996). Speciation and hybridization in island birds. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 351,765 -772.
↵ Hedenström, A. and Alerstam, T. (1997). Optimum fuel loads in migratory birds: distinguishing between time and energy minimization. J. Theor. Biol. 189,227 -234. CrossRefMedlineWeb of Science
↵ Jackson, J. A. (1979). Insectivorous birds and North American forest ecosystems. In The Role of Insectivorous Birds in Forest Ecosystems (ed. J. G. Dickinson, R. N. Connor, R. R. Fleet, J. A. Jackson and J. C. Kroll), pp. 1-7. New York: Academic Press.
↵ Jones, P. J. and Ward, P. (1976). Level of reserve protein as proximate factor controlling timing of breeding and clutch-size in red-billed quelea Quelea quelea. Ibis 118,547 -574. Web of Science
↵ Klaassen, M., Kvist, A. and Lindström, Å. (2000). Flight costs and fuel composition of a bird migrating in a wind tunnel. Condor 102,444 -451. CrossRef
↵ Kraus, J. D. (1986). Radio Astronomy. Powell: Cygnus-Quasar Books.
↵ Lawton, J. H. and May, R. M. (1983). The birds of Selbourne. Nature 306,732 -733. CrossRef
↵ Lipp, H. P., Vyssotski, A. L., Wolfer, D. P., Renaudineau, S., Savini, M., Troster, G. and Dell'Omo, G. (2004). Pigeon homing along highways and exits. Curr. Biol. 14,1239 -1249. CrossRefMedlineWeb of Science
↵ Lord, R. D., Bellrose, F. C. and Cochran, W. W. (1962). Radio telemetry of the respiration of a flying duck. Science 137,39 -40. Abstract/FREE Full Text
↵ Malkinson, M., Banet, C., Weisman, Y., Pokamunski, S., King, R., Drouet, M. T. and Deubel, V. (2002). Introduction of West Nile virus in the Middle East by migrating white storks. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 8,392 -397. MedlineWeb of Science
↵ Malthus, T. (1995). Mapping and monitoring of Quelea habitats in East-Africa. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Syst. 9,650 .
↵ Manikowski, S. (1988). Aerial spraying of Quelea. Trop. Pest Manag. 34,133 -140.
↵ Marshall, A. J. and Disney, H. (1956). Photostimulation of an equatorial bird (Quelea quelea, Linnaeus). Nature 177,143 -144. CrossRefMedlineWeb of Science
↵ McNamara, J. M., Welham, R. K. and Houston, A. I. (1998). The timing of migration within the context of an annual routine. J. Avian Biol. 29,416 -423. CrossRef
↵ Moore, F. R. (2000). Stopover Ecology of Nearctic-Neotropical Landbird Migrants: Habitat Relations and Conservation Implications. Lawrence: Allen Press.
↵ Moore, F. R. and Simons, T. R. (1992). Habitat suitability and stopover ecology of Neotropical landbird migrants. In Ecology and Conservation of Neotropical Migrant Landbirds (ed. J. M. Hagan, III and D. W. Johnston), pp.345 -355. Washingon, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.
↵ Muheim, R., Moore, F. R. and Phillips, J. B. (2006). Calibration of magnetic and celestial compass cues in migratory birds - a review of cue-conflict experiments. J. Exp. Biol. 209,2 -17. Abstract/FREE Full Text
↵ Mullie, W. C., Diallo, A. O., Gadji, B. and Ndiaye, M. D. (1999). Environmental hazards of mobile ground spraying with cyanophos and fenthion for Quelea control in Senegal. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 43,1 -10. Medline
↵ Murray, D. L. and Fuller, M. R. (2000). A critical review of the effects of marking on the biology of vertebrates. In Research Techniques in Animal Ecology (ed. F. T. Boitani L), pp. 15-64. New York: Columbia University Press.
↵ Naef-Daenzer, D. F., Stalder, M., Wetli, P. and Weise, E. (2005). Miniaturization (0.2 g) and evaluation of attachment techniques of telemetry transmitters. J. Exp. Biol. 208,4063 -4068. Abstract/FREE Full Text
↵ National Academy of Sciences (2001). Grand Challenges in Environmental Sciences. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
↵ Peck, A. L. (1968). Aristotle: Parts of Animals, Movement of Animals, Progression of Animals. Boston: Harvard University Press.
↵ Pennycuick, C. J. (1969). The mechanics of bird migration. Ibis 111,525 -556.
↵ Perdeck, A. C. (1958). Two types of orientation in migrating starlings, Sturnus vulgaris L., and chaffinches, Fringilla coelebs L., as revealed by displacement experiments. Ardea 46,1 -37. Medline
↵ Rappole, J. H., Derrickson, S. R. and Hubalek, Z. (2000). Migratory birds and spread of West Nile virus in the Western Hemisphere. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 6, 319-328. MedlineWeb of Science
↵ Robinson, S. K., Thompson, F. R., Donovan, T. M., Whitehead, D. R. and Faaborg, J. (1995). Regional forest fragmentation and the nesting success of migratory birds. Science 267,1987 -1990. Abstract/FREE Full Text
↵ Rubenstein, D. R. and Hobson, K. A. (2004). From birds to butterflies: animal movement patterns and stable isotopes. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19,256 -263. CrossRefMedline
↵ Rubenstein, D. R., Chamberlain, C. P., Holmes, R. T., Ayres, M. P., Waldbauer, J. R., Graves, G. R. and Tuross, N. C. (2002). Linking breeding and wintering ranges of a migratory songbird using stable isotopes. Science 295,1062 -1065. Abstract/FREE Full Text
↵ Sherry, D. F. and Vaccarino, A. L. (1989). Hippocampus and memory for food caches in black-capped chickadees. Behav. Neurosci. 103,308 -318. CrossRefWeb of Science
↵ Sillett, T. S. and Holmes, R. T. (2002). Variation in survivorship of a migratory songbird throughout its annual cycle. J. Anim. Ecol. 71,296 -308. CrossRef
↵ Smith, F. A., Lyons, S. K., Ernest, S. K. M., Jones, K. E., Kaufman, D. M., Dayan, T., Marquet, P. A., Brown, J. H. and Haskell, J. P. (2003). Body mass of late quaternary mammals. Ecology 84,3403 . CrossRefWeb of Science
↵ Stokely, J. M. (2005). The Feasibility of Utilizing the Cellular Infrastructure for Urban Wildlife Telemetry. Alexandria: Virginia Polytechnic Institute and Virginia State University.
↵ Strasser, R. and Bingman, V. P. (1997). Goal recognition and the homing pigeon, Columba livia, hippocampal formation. Behav. Neurosci. 111,1245 -1256. CrossRefMedline
↵ Thompson, A. R., Moran, J. M. and Swenson, G. W., Jr (1986). Interferometry and Synthesis in Radio Astronomy. New York: John-Wiley-Interscience.
↵ Thorup, K. and Rahbek, C. (2004). How do geometric constraints influence migration patterns. Anim. Biodivers. Conserv. 27,319 -329.
↵ Tuttle, M. D. and Stevenson, D. E. (1977). Analysis of migration as a mortality factor in gray bat based on public recoveries of banded bats. Am. Midl. Nat. 97,235 -240. CrossRef
↵ Wallraff, H.-G. (1999). The magnetic map of homing pigeons: an evergreen phantom. J. Theor. Biol. 197,265 -269. CrossRefMedlineWeb of Science
↵ Ward, P. (1971). Migration patterns of Quelea quelea in Africa. Ibis 113,275 -286.
↵ Webster, M. S., Marra, P. P., Haig, S. M., Bensch, S. and Holmes, R. T. (2002). Links between worlds: unraveling migratory connectivity. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17, 76-83.
↵ Weimerskirch, H., Salamolard, M., Sarrazin, F. and Jouventin, P. (1993). Foraging strategy of wandering albatrosses through the breeding season: a study using satellite telemetry. Auk 110,325 -342. Web of Science
↵ Wikelski, M., Tarlow, E. M., Raim, A., Diehl, R. H., Larkin, R. P. and Visser, G. H. (2003). Costs of migration in free-flying songbirds. Nature 423, 704. CrossRefMedline
↵ Wikelski, M., Moskowitz, D., Adelman, J. S., Cochran, J., Wilcove, D. S. and May, M. L. (2006). Simple rules guide dragonfly migration. Biol. Lett. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2006.0487 .
↵ Winkler, D. W., Wrege, P. H., Allen, P. E., Kast, T. L., Senesac, P., Wasson, M. F., Llambias, P. E., Ferretti, V. and Sullivan, P. J. (2004). Breeding dispersal and philopatry in the tree swallow. Condor 106,768 -776. CrossRef
↵ Wolfson, A. and Winchester, D. P. (1959). Effect of photoperiod on the gonadal and molt cycles of a tropical bird, Quelea quelea. Anat. Rec. 134,656 -657.
Articles citing this article
Intra-dance variation among waggle runs and the design of efficient protocols for honey bee dance decoding
Biology Open 2012 1:467-472.
SummaryFull TextFull Text (PDF)
Using tri-axial acceleration data to identify behavioral modes of free-ranging animals: general concepts and tools illustrated for griffon vultures
J. Exp. Biol. 2012 215:986-996.
SummaryFull TextFull Text (PDF)
The annual cycle of a trans-equatorial Eurasian-African passerine migrant: different spatio-temporal strategies for autumn and spring migration
Proc R Soc B 2012 279:1008-1016.
SummaryFull TextFull Text (PDF)
Grand Challenges in Migration Biology
Integr. Comp. Biol. 2010 50:261-279.
SummaryFull TextFull Text (PDF)
Local Temperature Fine-Tunes the Timing of Spring Migration in Birds
Integr. Comp. Biol. 2010 50:293-304.
SummaryFull TextFull Text (PDF)
Integrating Meteorology into Research on Migration
Integr. Comp. Biol. 2010 50:280-292.
SummaryFull TextFull Text (PDF)
Understanding the Migratory Orientation Program of Birds: Extending Laboratory Studies to Study Free-Flying Migrants in a Natural Setting
Integr. Comp. Biol. 2010 50:315-322.
SummaryFull TextFull Text (PDF)
Testing the role of sensory systems in the migratory heading of a songbird
J. Exp. Biol. 2009 212:4065-4071.
SummaryFull TextFull Text (PDF)
The bird GPS - long-range navigation in migrants
J. Exp. Biol. 2009 212:3597-3604.
SummaryFull TextFull Text (PDF)
Proximate control and adaptive potential of protandrous migration in birds
Integr. Comp. Biol. 2009 49:493-506.
SummaryFull TextFull Text (PDF)
Movement Ecology Special Feature: A movement ecology paradigm for unifying organismal movement research
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008 105:19052-19059.
SummaryFull TextFull Text (PDF)
Aeroecology: probing and modeling the aerosphere
Integr. Comp. Biol. 2008 48:1-11.
SummaryFull TextFull Text (PDF)
Optimal strategies for insects migrating in the flight boundary layer: mechanisms and consequences
Integr. Comp. Biol. 2008 48:119-133.
SummaryFull TextFull Text (PDF)
Evidence for a navigational map stretching across the continental U.S. in a migratory songbird
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007 104:18115-18119.
SummaryFull TextFull Text (PDF)
Category: research report | Comments: 0 | Rate:
0 Votes
You have rated this item.